jonathan


 

Stealing Satisfaction of judgment


1. Check Disbursement / $440,933.83

Bank of America- Legal Order Processing

File-1    File-2    Whole File  

 

2. Legal Fee for Bernstein / $171,643.63

3. Double Dipping / $275,001.97

 

Attorney Bernstein has refused to disclose the disbursement of funds, which suggests double-dipping. Check here

 

Other documents related to double-dipping:

 

 

Agreements of the Nurses  

4. Escrow Account / $13,544.04

5. Nurses Never Received the money from Settlement / $30,835.92

Total $ 931,959.39

6. Satisfaction of judgment cannot prove the $ 931,959.39

 

SUMMARY ORDER

 

Whole Summary about the Case Judgement Order Letter Letter

 

Motion to the court and Mr. Bernstein’s reply:  Case 1;07-cv-04672 Mr. Bernstein’s reply  

 

Mr. Bernstein does not have the right to act as the department of labor  https://openjurist.org/840/f2d/1054/brock-v-superior-care-inc    

 


Distribution of Funds According to Bernstein


 

 

Distribution of Funds According to Bernstein

Judgment Details

  1. MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment regarding damages is GRANTED. Plaintiffs will receive $309,535.88 for unpaid overtime wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages, totaling $619,071.76. Defendants are jointly and severally responsible for these damages. Defendants’ motion to strike the Plaintiffs’ reply memorandum of law is DENIED. The plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions is DENIED. This order was given by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/14/2012.

  2. MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendants’ 113 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. The plaintiffs’ 107 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Gayle and DENIED without prejudice for the remaining Plaintiffs. Gayle will receive $7,390 for unpaid overtime and the same amount in liquidated damages, totaling $14,780. The defendants are jointly and severally liable. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 12/31/2010, although he executed the judgment in January 2013 and proceeded with 1099 in 2012 to the state supreme court. Case 179.  

 

Breakdown of the Judgment

DE-180 Judgment 1 and the Outstanding Balance 1099 -part one The first judgment on 9/19/2012 was $633851.76 ($61907176 + $14780). However, only $440933.83 was distributed to the plaintiffs in 2013. The remaining $192917.93 wasn’t given to the nurses. The 1099 was registered in 2012, but checks were issued in 2013, 2014, 2015, and later. See the unsatisfactory judgment resolution by private attorney Mr. Jonathan Bernstein here.

 

Independent Contractor: 1099

 

3. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/27/2013. (Lee, Tiffeny)ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Judge Go’s R&R is ADOPTED in full. Defendants’ motion to amend the court’s order on summary judgment is DENIED; Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the court’s order on summary judgment is GRANTED as follows: (a) an award of damages of $300 to Ramdeo Chankar Singh for overtime wages of $150 and liquidated damages of $150 is added; (b) an award of damages of $1, 140 to Getty Rocourt for overtime wages of $570 and liquidated damages of $570 are added; ( c) an additional award for overtime wages for Jane Burke Hylton of $3,256 and liquidated damages of $3,256 for a total amended award of damages of $143,712 is added; (d) the award for overtime wages and liquidated damages owed to Yolanda Robinson is recalculated, awarding overtime wages of $105,432 and liquidated damages of$105,432, for an amended award of damages of $210,864; and Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is GRANTED as calculated by Judge Go’s R&R, totaling fees of $127,754.17 and costs of $2,460.29.  

 

DE-214 Judgement 2 and the Outstanding Balance

Independent Contractor: 1099-part two  

 

DE-226 Judgement  3 $41429.17 4/15/2015

1099-part three  

From these judgments, he retained $192917.93 + $256,678.46 + $41429.17. The total collected was $931,959.39, but he only distributed $440,933.83. He held onto $491,025.56, which is 52.68% of the total.

 

The checks made by Mr. Bernstein in the following file cannot be verified because the concerning records are sealed.

 

 

Double Dipping         Proof

 

Recent Stealing:

Recently, Mr. Bernstein comes up with a new idea to take the money as the so-called attorney’s fees. He used two cases, ‘Gayle v Harry’s Nurses Registry and Harry Dorvilier [(1:07-cv-04672-NGG-PK),  Docket 279] and ‘Isigi Gayle v Harry’s Nurses Registry and Harry Dorvilier [1:16-cv-2218(FB)(SMG),  Docket 103] as the reference and the judge allowed him to steal the money. Read the file below:

 

Gayle v Harry          Isigi vs Harry

Money Stealing Through Gayle Case: ~$36,000.00 

Money Stealing Through Gayle Case – Marshal Notice: ~$20,000.00 

According to this letter, Jonathon Bernstein has confessed that he did not release the fund to the nurses and he holds the money.

 

Read the letter from Bernstein:

 

Bernstein Stealing Money Using a Firm Name


Private attorney Mr. Jonathan Bernstein has long been stealing money by misrepresenting, misinterpreting the laws and it never waivered since his activities are still ongoing. In a recent event, he stole a bounce of money under a law firm where he is no more engaged with, such a proven record concludes with displaying an impersonation of a sneaking individual. Such incredulous savagery and oppression should be repressed poignantly. Read the documents here

 


Profile of Crook Attorneys and Associates


 


Threatening Letter from Attorney Shelley Ann Quilty


 


Reply from HNR


 


Order from Judge Garaufis on Satisfaction of Judgment


 


Attorney’s Fees


07/14/2020 –> $11,944.50

03/10/2023  –> $18,098.61

 

On a note, In total $931,959.39 was collected unjustifiably. In total the amount is: $962,002.5

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Hi! Welcome to harryshomecare.com!

Thanks for visting us! Stay updated by subscribing to the RSS feed.

Log In