Gayle v. Harry’s Nurses Registry, Inc. et al –> 1:07-cv-04672-NGG-PK –> Date Filed: 11/07/2007

• Docket – #53:MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and denying defendants motion for summary judgment. In addition, plaintiffs motion seeking leave to circulate a notice of pendency pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) is granted. Defendants are directed to disclose the names, last known addresses, dates of employment, and telephone numbers for all persons employed as field or per diem nurses from November 7, 2004 to the present on or before April 9, 2009. Plaintiff is directed to settle a proposed Notice of Pendency and consent form on or before the same date. Ordered by Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton on 3/9/2009. (Sifton, Charles) (Entered: 03/09/2009) Added Accounted statement from 2005.[ROGERS AND CO_2005]
• Docket – #127:MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendants’ 113 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ 107 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Gayle and DENIED without prejudice with respect to the remaining Plaintiffs. Gayle is awarded $7,390 in unpaid overtime and the same amount as liquidated damages, for a total of $14,780. Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable for those damages. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 12/23/2010. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Main Document 127 replaced on 12/30/2010) (Lee, Tiffeny). (Entered: 12/30/2010)
• Docket – #179: MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on damages is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall be awarded $309,535.88 in unpaid overtime wages and the same amount in liquidated damages, for a total of $619,071.76; Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable for these damages. Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiffs’ reply memorandum of law is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions is DENIED. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/14/2012. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 09/18/2012)
• Docket – #211: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Judge Go’s R&R is ADOPTED in full. Defendants’ motion to amend the court’s order on summary judgment is DENIED; Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the court’s order on summary judgment is GRANTED as follows: (a) an award of damages of $300 to Ramdeo Chankar Singh for overtime wages of $150 and liquidated damages of $150 is added; (b) an award of damages of $1, 140 to Getty Rocourt for overtime wages of $570 and liquidated damages of $570 is added; ( c) an additional award for overtime wages for Jane Burke Hylton of $3,256 and liquidated damages of $3,256 for a total amended award of damages of $143,712 is added; (d) the award for overtime wages and liquidated damages owed to Yolanda Robinson is recalculated, awarding overtime wages of $105,432 and liquidated damages of$105,432, for an amended award of damages of $210,864; and Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is GRANTED as calculated by Judge Go’s R&R, totaling fees of $127,754.17 and costs of $2,460.29. The court’s memorandum and opinion entered on September 19, 2012, is thereby amended to reflect these judgments and the R&R as adopted in full. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/27/2013. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/01/2013)
• Docket – #225: MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 221 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiffs’ motion for additional attorneys’ fees and costs related to post-judgment proceedings and the appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is GRANTED IN PART. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), the court AWARDS to Plaintiffs $41,429.17 in post-judgment attorneys’ fees and costs. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/06/2015. (fwd’d for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 04/14/2015)
• Docket – #225: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Judge Kuo issued the annexed 279 R&R on July 14, 2020, recommending that the court grant Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $11,944.50. No party has objected to Judge Kuo’s R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. of Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Gesualdi v. Mack Excavation & Trailer Serv., Inc., No. 09-CV-2502 (KAM) (JO), 2010 WL 985294, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); La Torres v. Walker, 216F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the R&R in full. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 7/31/2020. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 07/31/2020)
• Docket – #311: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Judge Kuo issued the annexed 310 R&R on February 10, 2023, recommending that the court grant Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $18,098.61. No party has objected to Judge Kuo’s R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. of Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Rubinstein & Assocs., PLLC v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc., 554 F. Supp. 3d 506, 510 (E.D.N.Y. 2021). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the R&R in full. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/10/2023. (TL) (Entered: 03/10/2023)
• Docket – #324: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 316 Motion for Attorney Fees. Judge Kuo issued the annexed R&R on September 13, 2024, recommending that the court grant Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $12,335.00 and costs in the amount of $89.10. (R&R (0kt. 323) at 8.)The court reviews the 323 R&R for clear error. See Rubinstein & Assocs., PUC v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc., 554 F. Supp. 3d 506, 510 (E.D.N.Y. 2021). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the R&R in full. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/30/2024. (fwd’d for jgm) (TLH) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
• Document- 106: PERMANENT INJUNCTION 23-CV-6661 (PKC) (TAM)
  PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Based upon all papers submitted by Plaintiff Claudia Williams (“Plaintiff”) in support of
  her motion for default judgment and the damages inquest held on April 15, 2025,1 the Court finds, for the reasons more fully explained on the record, that Plaintiff has met the standard for permanent injunction.
• Document- 118 for ORDER FOR SANCTIONS -“ORDERED that, by 5 p.m. on Friday, September 12, 2025, Dorvilier must pay the current total of $29,000 in sanctions to the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of New York, with a letter identifying the case name and docket number, and the purpose of the payment as “Payment of sanctions ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on September 4, 2025.”
• Document 119-02: Case 1:23-cv-06661-PKC-LKE Mr. Harry Dorvilier paid $29,000 to Eastern District of NY.
• December 16, 2025 Satisfaction of Judgement form duly filed with the Queens County Clerk; Williams v. Harry’s Nurses Registry Inc case 23 Civ 6661 (PKC) (LKE)
• January 15, 2026 Jonathan Bernstein agreed that the judgement is now fully satisfied.  (Bank of America Doc)

McFarlane et al v. Harry’s Nurses Registry, Inc. et al –> 1:17-cv-06350-PKC-PK –> Date Filed: 11/01/2017

• Docket – #61: ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court (1) grants Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion as to Defendant Dorvilier’s liability under the FLSA and NYLL for failure to pay wages and overtime wages, but denies summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ request for damages on those claims; (2) grants Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to Defendant Dorvilier’s liability for liquidated damages under the FLSA and NYLL, but denies summary judgment as to the amount of damages; (3) denies Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion as to retaliation under the FLSA and NYLL; (4) denies Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion as to adequate records under the NYLL; and (5) grants Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against Defendants Harry’s Nurses and Harry’s HomeCare, as to liability for unpaid wages, overtime, and liquidated damages under the FLSA and NYLL, but denies default judgment as to their claims against Harry’s Nurses and Harry’s HomeCare for retaliation under the FLSA and NYLL, and for failure to comply with the NYLL records requirements. The Court defers the award of damages as to Defendants Harry’s Nurses and Harry’s HomeCare until after further summary judgment briefing or a damages trial as to Defendant Dorvilier. In light of the above findings, the Court encourages Plaintiffs to consider pursuing, via a supplemental summary judgment motion, damages using a regular rate of pay of $19.00/hour and overtime rate of $28.50/hour, rather than proceeding to trial on damages. The Court grants Plaintiffs leave to renew their motion for summary judgment based on damages for their unpaid wages, overtime pay, and liquidated damages claims, as to which Defendants have been found liable as a matter of law, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Should Plaintiffs opt not to do so, the parties shall file a joint pre-trial order, in anticipation of a damages trial, that complies with the Court’s Individual Rules within sixty (60) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 4/2/2020. (Marks, Miriam) (Entered: 04/02/2020)
• Docket – #68: ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, Plaintiffs’ 66 supplemental motion for summary judgment as to damages is granted, and Plaintiffs are awarded judgment in a total amount of $59,587. This total amount represents $2,164.16 in unpaid wages and overtime pay plus $2,164.16 in liquidated damages for Plaintiff McFarlane; $18,522.66 in unpaid wages and overtime pay plus $18,522.66 in liquidated damages for Plaintiff Palmer; and $9,106.68 in unpaid wages and overtime pay plus $9,106.68 in liquidated damages for Plaintiff Williams. Defendants are jointly and severally liable for these damages. Within thirty (30) days of this Order, Plaintiffs may file a motion for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses, along with proof of such fees and expenses. Defendants shall have thirty (30) days to respond to any such motion. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 12/7/2020. (Nguyen, Andrew) (Entered: 12/07/2020)
• Docket – #79: ORDER: As explained in the attached Memorandum & Order, Plaintiffs’ 74 motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiffs are awarded $35,793.75 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and $460.50 in reasonable costs. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/28/2021. (Nguyen, Andrew) (Entered: 06/28/2021)

Isigi v. Harry’s Nurses Registry et al –-> 1:16-cv-02218-FB-SMG –> Date Filed 05/03/2016

• Docket – #87: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Memorandum and Order 56 & 61 MOTION for Damages filed by Roselyn Isigi. For the reasons stated herein, I respectfully recommend that plaintiff be awarded $117,318.25 in unpaid overtime wages; $97,510 in liquidated damages on her FLSA and NYLL claims for unpaid overtime wages; $40,412.45 in pre-judgment interest on her claims under NYLL for unpaid overtime wages; $12,096 in lost wages on her retaliation claim; $5000 in emotional distress damages on her retaliation claim; $5000 in liquidated damages on her retaliation claim; and $44,890.58 in attorney’s fees and costs. Any objections to the recommendations contained in this Report must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of the date of this Report and in any event no later than March 28, 2018. Failure to object to this Report may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72; See Small v. Sec’y of Health & Human Services, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 3/14/2018. (Recca, Vincent) (Entered: 03/14/2018)
• Docket – #90: CLERK’S JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Plaintiff in the total amount of $322,227.28. Signed Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court, by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on April 2, 2018. (Williams, Erica) (Entered: 04/03/2018)
• Docket – #103: MEMORANDUM and ORDER: Plaintiffs motion 100 for attorneys fees and costs is granted in the amount of $26,671.35. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 6/22/2020. (Innelli, Michael) (Main Document 103 replaced on 6/22/2020) (Innelli, Michael). Modified on 6/22/2020 TO CORRECT THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY’S NEW ADDRESS. (Innelli, Michael). (Main Document 103 replaced on 6/22/2020) (Innelli, Michael). (Entered: 06/22/2020)

Williams v. Harry’s Nurses Registry, Inc. et al –> 1:23-cv-06661-PKC-LKE –> Date filed: 09/07/2023

• ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the fully-briefed 61 contempt motion and 72 Plaintiff’s letter requesting oral argument on the contempt motion and a trial date. Plaintiff’s requests are granted in part and denied in part. The Court shall hold a hearing on the contempt motion on Friday, September 13, 2024 at 10am in Courtroom 4F North. Defendant Harry Dorvilier is ordered to appear at the hearing and may be called to testify as to the facts relating to the alleged contempt, including whether he committed perjury in his sworn affidavit (Dkt. 74-1) regarding redaction of the video at issue in this motion. Plaintiff’s request for a trial date is denied as premature. The parties are further ordered to submit a Joint Pre-trial Order that fully complies with the Court’s Individual Rules & Practices by November 4, 2024. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/4/2024. (MLB) (Entered: 09/04/2024)
• ORDER: The Court is in receipt of 78 Plaintiff’s letter indicating that Defendants have not complied with the Court’s deadline to hire a third-party data privacy firm to review all of their publications and media materials and to inform Plaintiff of the selected firm. (See 9/13/2024 Min. Entry.) The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for Defendants to do so to October 4, 2024. If Defendants do not comply with this extended deadline, the Court will impose sanctions of $200 per day on Defendants until they comply. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/30/2024. (MLB) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
•  #104TRIAL BRIEF of Apr 11, 2025  by Claudia Williams (Bernstein, Jonathan) (Entered: 04/11/2025)
• Permanent Injection Order: For the reasons stated on the record at the April 15, 2025, damages inquest, the Court issues the attached permanent injunction, effective immediately. The Court retains jurisdiction over its enforcement. For any future violations, Defendants will be fined $500 per day that they violate the injunction. Should any violation continue for more than two weeks, the fine will double to $1,000 per day. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 4/15/2025. (EB) (Entered: 04/15/2025)
• Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Pamela K. Chen: Damages Inquest Hearing held on 4/15/2025, via video. Jonathan Bernstein (for Plaintiff). No appearance by Harry’s Nurses Registry, Inc. (in default). Although pro se Defendant Harry Dorvilier appeared on screen about one hour into the proceeding, because he is in default and wished to question Plaintiff about matters that the Court deemed irrelevant and harassing, he was not permitted to participate in the hearing. Case called. Witnesses sworn. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court found default judgment against Defendants appropriate. The Court granted Plaintiff permanent injunctive relief, effective immediately, as well as the following damages: $15,000 in liquidated damages under the New York Labor Law; $40,000 in damages for emotional distress; and $50,000 in punitive damages. Plaintiff’s counsel confirmed Plaintiff will be seeking attorneys’ fees separately and is directed to file billing records in support of this separate request by April 22, 2025. A written Memorandum & Order will be issued later further explaining the Court’s rulings. (Court Reporter Nicole Sesta.) Entry refiled on 4/16/2025 to correct filing error. (FG) (Entered: 04/16/2025)
• Docket #116    CASE 1:23-CV-06661-PKC-LKE HARRY’S NURSES REGISTRY INC AND HARRY DORVILIER VS. PAMELA K. CHEN, US DISTRICT JUDGE. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLAUDIA WILLIAMS, f/k/a CLAUDIA GAYLE, Plaintiff,  – against – HARRY’S NURSES REGISTRY, INC. and HARRY DORVILIER, Defendants. PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge (Entered:08/28/25)
• Docket-#118 CASE 1:23-CV-06661-PKC-LKE, On July 31, 2025, Plaintiff filed her fourth motion for contempt (“Motion”) based on Defendant Dorvilier’s (“Dorvilier”) alleged violation of the permanent injunction (“PI”) issued by the Court on April 15, 2025. (Mot. for Contempt, Dkt. 114; PI, Dkt. 106.) In her Motion, Plaintiff alerted the Court to a YouTube video posted by Dorvilier “consist[ing] primarily of Mr. Dorvilier’s discussion of his view that [Plaintiff] is a ‘ghost,’ i.e., not a real person.” (Mot. for Contempt,Dkt. 114, at 2.) Dorvilier mentions Plaintiff by name several times and apparently alludes to this Court’s [PI]: “‘The judge said, now, if you talk about Claudia Gayle, about her and the law, you’re going to be[] penalized $500 per day[.]’” (Id. (quoting Dorvilier’s video).) On August 19, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to confirm whether the violation was ongoing, (8/19/2025 Dkt. Order), which Plaintiff confirmed the same day, (Pl. Ltr., Dkt. 115). The Court also directed Dorvilier to “show cause why he should not be fined as required by the PI for the duration of the violation identified by Plaintiff” by August 28, 2025. (8/19/2025 Dkt. Order.) To date, Dorvilier has failed to respond (Entered:09/04/25). Document- 118 for ORDER FOR SANCTIONS -“ORDERED that, by 5 p.m. on Friday, September 12, 2025, Dorvilier must pay the current total of $29,000 in sanctions to the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of New York, with a letter identifying the case name and docket number, and the purpose of the payment as “Payment of sanctions ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on September 4, 2025.”
• Document 119-02: Case 1:23-cv-06661-PKC-LKE Mr. Harry Dorvilier paid $29,000 to Eastern District of NY.

Lucille Hamilton v. Harry Dorvilier –> Lucille Hamilton v. Harry Dorvilier

EBORAH MCCABE v. Harry’s Nurses Registry Inc. –>  Index No: 153822/2020

• On 06/02/2020 a Complaint, Petition was filed involving a dispute between Deborah Mccabe, and Harry Dorvilier, Harry’S Nurses Registry, Inc (Index:153822/2020)
• On 9/15/2020 Affidavit of service for Deborah Mccabe, vs. Harry Dorvilier, Harry’S Nurses Registry, Inc (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 )
• On 5/11/2021 AFFIRMATION OF CLARA LAM, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF BROWN KWON & LAM, LLP’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF DEBORAH MCCABE PURSUANT TO CPLR § 321(b)(2) (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6)
• On 5/11/2021 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION  (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10)
• On 5/12/2021 Order to Show Cause  (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11)
• On 5/17/2021 AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12)
• On 6/17/2021 Decision and Order of Motion  (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13)