add_filter( 'admin_email_check_interval','__return_false' );

Administrator David Weil “economic realities” test is not a violation under FLSA, Gayle v. Harry’s Nurses Registry, Inc., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23029 (2d Cir. Dec. 8, 2014) case should be reversed!

WHD Administrator Weil Announces Impending “Administrator Interpretation” Regarding Contractor Status

David Weilhttps://www.fissuredworkplace.net/about-david-weil.php

By Noel P. Tripp on June 8, 2015

Administrator’s Interpretations” from the Wage Hour Division have been relatively few and far between since their implementation in 2010. However, on Friday Administrator David Weil, speaking at a conference at New York University School of Law, indicated his office would be issuing such an interpretation to “clarify” who qualifies as an independent contractor under the FLSA through a “very clear set of criteria.” Administrator Weil indicated that this clarifying Interpretation would expand upon but not deviate from the “economic realities” test courts continue to reference in analyzing this issue. Gayle v. Harry’s Nurses Registry, Inc., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23029 (2d Cir. Dec. 8, 2014) (reiterating application of “economic realities” test under FLSA). Watch this space for further coverage of federal and state rulemaking and related guidance.

 

 

US LABOR DEPARTMENT SIGNS AGREEMENTS WITH NY LABOR DEPARTMENT AND NY ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE TO REDUCE MISCLASSIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES

https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20121118

 

29 U.S. Code § 252 – Relief from certain existing claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, the Walsh-Healey Act, and the Bacon-Davis Act

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title29/html/USCODE-2011-title29-chap9.htm

 

§252. Relief from certain existing claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, the Walsh-Healey Act, and the Bacon-Davis Act

(a) Liability of employer

No employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.] the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act 1 (in any action or proceeding commenced prior to or on or after May 14, 1947), on account of the failure of such employer to pay an employee minimum wages, or to pay an employee overtime compensation, for or on account of any activity of an employee engaged in prior to May 14, 1947, except an activity which was compensable by either—

(1) an express provision of a written or nonwritten contract in effect, at the time of such activity, between such employee, his agent, or collective-bargaining representative and his employer; or

(2) a custom or practice in effect, at the time of such activity, at the establishment or other place where such employee was employed, covering such activity, not inconsistent with a written or nonwritten contract, in effect at the time of such activity, between such employee, his agent, or collective-bargaining representative and his employer.

(b) Compensable activity

For the purposes of subsection (a) of this section, an activity shall be considered as compensable under such contract provision or such custom or practice only when it was engaged in during the portion of the day with respect to which it was so made compensable.

(c) Time of employment

In the application of the minimum wage and overtime compensation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], of the Walsh-Healey Act, or of the Bacon-Davis Act,1 in determining the time for which an employer employed an employee there shall be counted all that time, but only that time, during which the employee engaged in activities which were compensable within the meaning of subsections (a) and (b) of this section.

(d) Jurisdiction

No court of the United States, of any State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, shall have jurisdiction of any action or proceeding, whether instituted prior to or on or after May 14, 1947, to enforce liability or impose punishment for or on account of the failure of the employer to pay minimum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], under the Walsh-Healey Act, or under the Bacon-Davis Act,1 to the extent that such action or proceeding seeks to enforce any liability or impose any punishment with respect to an activity which was not compensable under subsections (a) and (b) of this section.

(e) Assignment of actions

No cause of action based on unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation, or liquidated damages, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 which accrued prior to May 14, 1947, or any interest in such cause of action, shall hereafter be assignable, in whole or in part, to the extent that such cause of action is based on an activity which was not compensable within the meaning of subsections (a) and (b) of this section.

(May 14, 1947, ch. 52, §2, 61 Stat. 85.)

References in Text

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, referred to in subsecs. (a), (c) to (e), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of this title and Tables.

The Walsh-Healey and Bacon-Davis Acts, referred to in subsecs. (a), (c) to (e), are defined for purposes of this chapter in section 262 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/252

 

Comments are closed.



Hi! Welcome to harryshomecare.com!

Thanks for visting us! Stay updated by subscribing to the RSS feed.

Log In