Attorney Bernstein has refused to disclose the disbursement of funds, which suggests double-dipping. Check here
Other documents related to double-dipping:
-
Bernstein keeps in his Escrow
-
-
Total $ 931,959.39
Distribution of Funds According to Bernstein
Judgment Details
-
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment regarding damages is GRANTED. Plaintiffs will receive $309,535.88 for unpaid overtime wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages, totaling $619,071.76. Defendants are jointly and severally responsible for these damages. Defendants’ motion to strike the Plaintiffs’ reply memorandum of law is DENIED. The plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions is DENIED. This order was given by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/14/2012.
-
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendants’ 113 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. The plaintiffs’ 107 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Gayle and DENIED without prejudice for the remaining Plaintiffs. Gayle will receive $7,390 for unpaid overtime and the same amount in liquidated damages, totaling $14,780. The defendants are jointly and severally liable. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 12/31/2010, although he executed the judgment in January 2013 and proceeded with 1099 in 2012 to the state supreme court. Case 179.
Breakdown of the Judgment
DE-180 Judgment 1 and the Outstanding Balance 1099 -part one The first judgment on 9/19/2012 was $633851.76 ($61907176 + $14780). However, only $440933.83 was distributed to the plaintiffs in 2013. The remaining $192917.93 wasn’t given to the nurses. The 1099 was registered in 2012, but checks were issued in 2013, 2014, 2015, and later. See the unsatisfactory judgment resolution by private attorney Mr. Jonathan Bernstein here.
3. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/27/2013. (Lee, Tiffeny)ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Judge Go’s R&R is ADOPTED in full. Defendants’ motion to amend the court’s order on summary judgment is DENIED; Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the court’s order on summary judgment is GRANTED as follows: (a) an award of damages of $300 to Ramdeo Chankar Singh for overtime wages of $150 and liquidated damages of $150 is added; (b) an award of damages of $1, 140 to Getty Rocourt for overtime wages of $570 and liquidated damages of $570 are added; ( c) an additional award for overtime wages for Jane Burke Hylton of $3,256 and liquidated damages of $3,256 for a total amended award of damages of $143,712 is added; (d) the award for overtime wages and liquidated damages owed to Yolanda Robinson is recalculated, awarding overtime wages of $105,432 and liquidated damages of$105,432, for an amended award of damages of $210,864; and Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is GRANTED as calculated by Judge Go’s R&R, totaling fees of $127,754.17 and costs of $2,460.29.
DE-226 Judgement 3 $41429.17 4/15/2015
From these judgments, he retained $192917.93 + $256,678.46 + $41429.17. The total collected was $931,959.39, but he only distributed $440,933.83. He held onto $491,025.56, which is 52.68% of the total.
The checks made by Mr. Bernstein in the following file cannot be verified because the concerning records are sealed.
Recent Stealing:
Recently, Mr. Bernstein comes up with a new idea to take the money as the so-called attorney’s fees. He used two cases, ‘Gayle v Harry’s Nurses Registry and Harry Dorvilier [(1:07-cv-04672-NGG-PK), Docket 279] and ‘Isigi Gayle v Harry’s Nurses Registry and Harry Dorvilier [1:16-cv-2218(FB)(SMG), Docket 103] as the reference and the judge allowed him to steal the money. Read the file below:
According to this letter, Jonathon Bernstein has confessed that he did not release the fund to the nurses and he holds the money.
Bernstein Stealing Money Using a Firm Name
Private attorney Mr. Jonathan Bernstein has long been stealing money by misrepresenting, misinterpreting the laws and it never waivered since his activities are still ongoing. In a recent event, he stole a bounce of money under a law firm where he is no more engaged with, such a proven record concludes with displaying an impersonation of a sneaking individual. Such incredulous savagery and oppression should be repressed poignantly. Read the documents here
Judgments
Judgment for Gayle $619,071.76
Judgment for Gayle 256,678.46
Judgment Order for Gayle 256,678.46
Judgment for Gayle $41,429.17
Judgment Order for Gayle $41,429.17
Attorney’s Fees
07/14/2020 –> $11,944.50
03/10/2023 –> $18,098.61
09/30/2024 –> $12,335.00 Recommendation for Attorney Fees | Order for Attorney Fees
On a note, In total $931,959.39 was collected unjustifiably. In total the amount is: $962,002.5
US-district-court-Pro-Se
Harry’s petition waiver of opposition
